The Joker has been a standout villain in DC movies for decades, captivating audiences with his chaotic energy and twisted humor. From Jack Nicholson to Heath Ledger to Joaquin Phoenix, each actor brought something unique to the character. But when you watch these films again, some elements just don’t seem as impressive as they did the first time around.
1. The Rushed Origin Story in 1989’s Batman
Jack Nicholson’s transformation from gangster Jack Napier to the Joker happens way too quickly to be believable. One minute he’s falling into a vat of chemicals, the next he’s a fully-formed criminal mastermind with an elaborate plan.
The psychological journey that should accompany such a dramatic change is completely skipped over. We never see him struggling with his new identity or developing his iconic laugh and mannerisms.
Modern viewers expect more depth in villain backstories, especially for a character as complex as the Joker. This simplified origin feels more like a comic book shortcut than the nuanced character study audiences now demand from superhero films.
2. Jared Leto’s Overhyped Method Acting
Remember all those wild stories about Jared Leto sending dead rats to castmates and never breaking character? The behind-the-scenes drama created expectations his actual performance in Suicide Squad never matched.
His limited screen time (barely 10 minutes) makes all the tattoos, grills, and “damaged” forehead tattoo feel like style over substance. The character comes across as a gangster playing dress-up rather than the psychological terrorist the Joker should be.
Fans were promised something revolutionary, but received a performance that felt disconnected from the Joker’s core traits – the cunning intelligence and unpredictable nature that make him truly frightening.
3. Heath Ledger’s Unexplained Scars
“Want to know how I got these scars?” became an iconic line from The Dark Knight, but the multiple contradictory stories the Joker tells about his facial scars now feel like a narrative cop-out.
While initially mysterious, this approach ultimately leaves a key character detail completely unresolved. The film teases us with possible origins but never commits to giving audiences any real understanding of his background.
This ambiguity worked brilliantly for creating tension during the first viewing, but on rewatches, it starts to feel like the writers simply couldn’t decide on a definitive backstory, leaving a frustrating hole in an otherwise masterfully crafted villain.
4. Cartoon Physics in Batman (1989)
The scene where Joker’s henchman gets electrocuted through his joy buzzer now looks downright silly. His skeleton flashes like something from a Saturday morning cartoon rather than a supposedly dark take on Batman.
Similarly, the parade scene features enormous balloons filled with deadly gas that somehow float perfectly despite their weight and the logistics of filling them. Nobody questions how the Joker acquired or transported these massive props.
Action sequences follow bizarre rules where bullets miss important characters while hitting extras with perfect accuracy. These cartoon-like physics might have worked in 1989, but they create a tonal mismatch with the film’s attempts at gritty realism.
5. Arthur Fleck’s Unreliable Timeline
Joaquin Phoenix’s Joker presents a timeline that becomes increasingly confusing on repeat viewings. The film deliberately blurs reality and delusion, but takes this concept so far that it undermines its own narrative coherence.
Key events like Arthur’s relationship with Sophie are revealed as fantasies, but this raises questions about which other scenes might be imagined. His mother’s backstory, his appearance on Murray’s show, and even his criminal transformation become suspect.
While this ambiguity creates interesting discussion points, it also makes the character’s actual journey frustratingly unclear. The film wants both the artistic freedom of an unreliable narrator and the emotional impact of a coherent character arc.
6. The Dancing Joker Trope Overload
From Nicholson’s museum rampage to Ledger’s hospital explosion to Phoenix’s bathroom ballet, Joker dancing has become an overused visual shorthand for the character’s madness. What once felt fresh now seems like a lazy directorial choice.
Phoenix’s staircase dance in particular received enormous attention, but on rewatching, it’s clear the scene doesn’t actually reveal anything new about the character. It’s visually striking but narratively empty, existing primarily to create iconic marketing imagery.
The repetition of this trope across different Joker interpretations suggests filmmakers are recycling ideas rather than finding truly innovative ways to express the character’s chaotic nature. Each new dance feels less impactful than the last.
7. Sudden Character Shifts in Suicide Squad
Leto’s Joker swings wildly between calculated criminal mastermind and lovesick boyfriend without any coherent character development. One minute he’s executing business rivals, the next he’s pining desperately for Harley Quinn.
These jarring personality shifts feel like scenes from different movies stitched together. The infamous reshoots and editing problems become painfully obvious when watching the film again, especially in how the Joker’s storyline feels disconnected from the main plot.
His motivations change to serve whatever the scene requires rather than following a consistent character arc. This makes it impossible to understand what this version of the Joker truly wants beyond vague notions of chaos and reuniting with Harley.
8. Overexplained Chaos in The Dark Knight
“I’m an agent of chaos” declares Ledger’s Joker, yet his plans involve impossibly precise timing and elaborate preparations. His schemes require predicting exact police responses and perfect execution from henchmen who seem disposable to him.
The hospital explosion, ferry scenario, and bank heist all demand meticulous planning that contradicts his supposed embrace of randomness. Even his capture appears to be part of a master plan rather than a genuine setback.
This contradiction becomes more glaring with each viewing. For someone who claims to hate schemers and plans, the Joker executes some of the most intricate criminal plots in superhero cinema. His philosophical stance against order rings hollow when his actions demonstrate such careful orchestration.
9. Inconsistent Rules About Joker Toxin
The deadly Joker toxin works differently in every film, making its effects seem arbitrary rather than scientifically consistent. Sometimes it kills instantly, other times it leaves victims with a permanent grin, and occasionally it just makes people laugh uncontrollably.
In Batman (1989), the toxin works through makeup products, while in other films it’s a gas or liquid. The antidotes and treatments also change without explanation, appearing whenever the plot requires salvation for important characters.
These inconsistencies reveal how the toxin serves as a convenient plot device rather than a well-thought-out element of the Joker’s arsenal. The rules change based on what creates the most dramatic scene rather than building a coherent threat across the films.
10. The Missing Psychological Depth in Joker (2019)
For a film supposedly centered on mental illness, Joker (2019) offers surprisingly shallow insights. Arthur’s condition is presented as a vague combination of symptoms that serve the plot rather than reflecting any realistic psychological disorder.
The movie gestures at social commentary about healthcare cuts and societal neglect but abandons these themes for a more simplistic “society created the monster” narrative. Arthur’s transformation feels less like a complex character study and more like a checklist of traumatic events.
Despite Phoenix’s committed performance, the script never truly explores the psychology that makes the Joker such an enduring villain. On rewatching, what initially seemed profound often reveals itself as surface-level observations dressed up in arthouse cinematography.
Leave a comment